Skip to main content

Much needed information about IMPEACHMENT


Welcome to yet another blog on be simply smart.
As you always know we decipher complicated and subtle things into much more easier and understandable language.
We would make you sound smarter among you're peers. We cover those topics which are a must go to topics for a casual discussion which are indeed profound

Impeachment is a legal process of levying charges against public officials. Impeachment does not in itself remove the official definitively from office; it is similar to an accusation in criminal law, and thus it is essentially the statement of charges against the official.

Whereas in some countries the individual is immediately removed, in others they can remain in office during the trial.
Because impeachment and conviction of officials involve an overturning of the normal constitutional procedures by which individuals achieve high office it requires high majority of votes in the respective parliament for a person to be impeached.

In the United States, for example, impeachment at the federal level is limited to those who may have committed "Treason, Bribery, or other higher crimes.

Impeachment exists under constitutional law in many countries around the world, including India, Brazil, France, Ireland, the Philippines, Russia, South Korea, and the United States.

The process was first used by the English "Good Parliament" against Baron latimer in the second half of the 14th century. Following the British example, the constitutions of Virginia (1776), Massachusetts (1780) and other states thereafter adopted the impeachment mechanism, but they restricted the punishment to removal of the official from office.


IMPEACHMENT PROVISONS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES




INDIA

The President and judges, including the chief justice of the Supreme court and high courts, can be impeached by the Parliament  before the expiry of the term for violation of the Constitution. Other than impeachment, no other penalty can be given to a president in position for the violation of the Constitution under Article 361 of the constitution. However a president after his/her term/removal can be punished for his already proven unlawful activity under disrespecting the constitution, etc.
 No president has faced impeachment proceedings. Hence, the provisions for impeachment have never been tested. The sitting president cannot be charged and needs to step down in order for that to happen.


UNITED STATES


Article one of the United States federal Constitution grants the rights to the general assembly and the Senate to try to impeach various officers in the United States federal government.
In the United States, impeachment is only the first of two stages, and conviction during the second stage requires "the acceptance of two thirds of the members present". Impeachment doesn't mean removal of the member but mostly convicts him or her to a criminal charges he or she has committed.
Trump being Impeached
Source:pixabay.com

An official who is impeached faces a second legislative vote ( by the same body or another), which determines conviction, or failure to conviction , on the charges alleged by the impeachment.

Most constitutions requires two-third of the majority of the members which is nearly impossible of the party whose president is elected has the majority in the senate to convict. Even if the subject of the charge is criminal action, it does not constitute a criminal trial, the only question under consideration is the removal of the individual from office.
Three United States presidents have been impeached by the House of Representatives till date  Andrew Johnson in 1868, Bill clinton in 1998, and Donald trump in 2019.
All three were acquitted and not removed from office by the Senate.

Additionally, the House has impeached 15 judges, one Cabinet secretary, and one senator. Eight officials have been convicted and removed from office, all of them were judges.


PAKISTAN

The country's ruling coalition said on 7 August 2008, that it would seek the impeachment of President Parvez Musharaf, alleging the U.S. backed former general had ' defied  the trust of the nation' and increasing pressure on him to resign. He resigned on 18 August 2008. Another kind of impeachment in Pakistan is known as the vote of less-confidence or vote  and has been practiced by provincial assemblies to weaken the national assembly.

Impeaching a president requires a two-thirds majority support of lawmakers in a joint session of both houses of Parliament.



FRANCE

In France the comparable procedure is called destitution. The President of France can be impeached by the French parliament for willfully violating the Constitution. The process of impeachment is written in the 68th article of the French constitution.A group of senators or a group of members of the National assembly can begin the process. Then, both the National Assembly and the Senate must.acknowledge the impeachment. After the upper and lower houses' agreement, they unite to form the High Court. Finally, the High Court must decide to declare the impeachment of the President, or not.


Thus we conclude with our profundity on the topic. Please give us any feedback and improvements you want us to implement into the blog untill then
SEE YA


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Absurd state of NORTH KOREA

Welcome to yet another blog on be simply smart. As you always know we decipher complicated and subtle things into much more easier and understandable language. We would make you sound smarter among you're peers. We cover those topics which are a must go to topics for a casual discussion which are indeed profound Korea which was divided hastily into North and South between the American and then Soviet Union resulted in creation of a completely new worlds. South Korea is polar opposite to what North Korea is. North Korea's capital pyangyong Source:pixabay.com North Korea is a dictatorship based country which follows communism as it's ideology. The leadership is aristocratic controlling every aspect of the country. •North Korea expenditure on military North Korea spends too much money on its defence. It uses it's military power often to threaten other nations. It spends around 20% of its GDP into military even though country faces acute poverty and scarci